@article { author = {نیا, سید محمد رضی مصطفوی and شهیدی, مهدی}, title = {A Comparative Analysis of Mosaic Rhyme"Compound pun" in Persian and Arabic Literature}, journal = {Quarterly of Arabic Language and Literature}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {-}, year = {2006}, publisher = {University of Tehran}, issn = {1735-9767}, eissn = {2423-6187}, doi = {}, abstract = {The comparative and contrastive analysis of pun (jeans) in Arabic and Persian languages has been making the Liberian’s minds engaged for ages. In the present essay, there has been a chance of studying and clarifying some of the differences of opinion between the two languages’ literatures regarding the pun in general, and the mosaic rhyme (compound pun) in specific. To do so, in the first place, we have define pun, explaining its role and importance in enrichment of words and form (appearance) of literature and secondly we have studied the concept and content of the pun in a way that various types of pun which have not ever been discussed in Persian, or even they have not been introduced subcategories of other literati terms rather that those of pun [i. e., they have been introduced subcategories of other literary terms rather that those of pun] are all presented and studied in the present survey. Notably, the most important and controversial issue of the present essay in the existence of contradiction as well as the deficiencies and mistakes in the opinions of “speech figures and rhetoric’s scholars” in Persian literature regarding the mosaic rhyme (compound pun) along with critical approach to some of those views. The study at the and comes to the conclusion that the literal of Arabic language have been more precise and exact concerning pun and its divisions, and they have presented more comprehensive and elaborated definitions and subcategories in comparison to Persian libertarians}, keywords = {mosaic rhyme compound pun,opinions criticism,Rhetoric’s,various types of pun in Persian and Arabic}, title_ar = {الجناس المرکب بین التعریف الفارسی و المنظور العربی}, abstract_ar = {کانت– و لم تزل– فکرة المقارنة بین الجناس فی اللغتین: الفارسیة و العربیة قد شغلت بال المهتمّین باللغتین عبر سنین و اعوام، فحالفنا الحظّ فی هذا المقال فی ان نسلّط الضوء علی بعض الخلافات الکامنة فی تقسیم الجناس عامة و تفصیل الجناس المرکب خاصة، وفی هذا السیاق تطرّقنا اولاً الی تعریف الجناس، و ما اولاه له الادباء من اهمّیة و اهتمام، و الدور الذی یلعبه فی إثراء مادة الأدب شکلاً و مضمونا، و لفظا و مفهوما، کما لم نهمل– قدر المستطاع و علی حسب ما یقتضیه المجال– ذکر انواع الجناس التی لم ترد فی الفارسیة أصلا، أو وردت و لکنهم لم یعتبروها جناساً، بل ادرجوها ضمن موضوع آخر. کما ان اهم ما نرمی إلیه فیما سنبحث عنه، هو الاشارة الی وجود التناقض من جهة و نقائص من جانب آخر فیما ابرز الفارسیون فی هذا المضمار من آراء و ما التزموا به من تقسیمات الجناس المرکب، فقمنا ختاماً بابداء بعض الآراء النقدیة فی الموضوع. فیستخلص القاریء الکریم فی ختام المقال و یحکم هو بنفسه انّ نظرة الادباء العرب فی المقام اکمل و اشمل بالنسبة الی الفارسیة.}, keywords_ar = {اقسام الجناس فی الفارسیة و العربیة,البدیع,الجناس المرکب,نقد الآراء}, url = {https://jal-lq.ut.ac.ir/article_19378.html}, eprint = {https://jal-lq.ut.ac.ir/article_19378_acfd3bafb37e2507fc8e1bbb71d58df1.pdf} }