Ebn-Almoqaffa in Narrative and Poetry (Formerly known as Quarterly of Arabic Language and Literature

Ebn-Almoqaffa in Narrative and Poetry (Formerly known as Quarterly of Arabic Language and Literature

The Dynamics of Silent Elements in Nature and Their Significations in the Poetry of Ibrahim Tuqan and Khalilullah Khalili: A Comparative Semiotic Study According to Michael Riffaterre’s Theory

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Arabic Language and Literature - College of Arts and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
2 Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
3 Department of Arabic Language and Literature, faculty of Arts and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
10.22059/jal-lq.2026.408248.1570
Abstract
Abstract

This study examines dynamic still-nature elements and their symbolic meanings in the poetry of Ibrahim Tuqan and Khalilullah Khalili using Michael Riffaterre’s semiotic theory. By distinguishing verbal meaning from deeper structural significance, the research reveals hidden symbolic layers. Comparing two poets from different linguistic, cultural, and geographical contexts shows how similar natural elements convey shared yet distinct symbolic functions. The research examines still natural elements suggesting movement, such as water, wind, breeze, storm, and sea, which transcend physical traits and function as linguistic and visual signs expressing political, social, and cultural meanings. Using a descriptive–analytical and comparative approach, the study analyzes selected Arabic and Afghan poems to reveal similarities and differences in symbolic representation across diverse and cultural contexts. Water is a central element in both poets’ works, reflecting personal identity and struggle in Tuqan, and symbolizing renewal in Khalili. The sea signifies crisis, while wind represents change and unrest. The breeze contrasts: it conveys hope and gentleness in Tuqan, yet appears weak and ineffective in Khalili, highlighting differing symbolic uses of natural elements in their poetry. The findings demonstrate that despite linguistic and cultural differences, both poets employ natural elements as implicit symbols to articulate social change, collective anxiety, and personal experience. The study underscores the value of semiotic analysis in deepening the interpretation of poetic texts and contributes to expanding comparative studies between Arabic and Afghan literature.

Keywords: Nature, Semiotics, Michael Riffaterre, Ibrahim Tuqan, Khalilullah Khalili, Comparative Study
Keywords
Subjects